On the Hokies' first play from scrimmage, Mike O'Cain calls the zone read. A good call to open the game. Like we've seen before, Logan Thomas holds the ball between him and David Wilson for a loooooooong time, then pulls it back and commits to a run up the gut. He makes positive yardage but is met HARD by the Clemson defensive tackle. LT fights for positive yardage and starts to go down a little funny, kind of backward and to the side. Instinct overrides fundamentals and LT sticks out his hand - still clutching the football - in an attempt to brace himself. The ball pops free and Clemson recovers just outside of their own red zone.
Well, I think to myself, here we go again.
I liken that play to that moment when you're teetering at the very top of the track, before the roller coaster goes plummeting down the other side. Because the entire rest of this game made me want to throw up.
Addressing the defense first, I am not shocked to see us give up 38 to Clemson on the second go round. Since we first played the Tigers in early October we were down a starting mike, a starting whip, and backup whip, and a starting defensive tackle. Kyle Fuller was playing out of position at whip, which put Cris Hill at field corner. That meant when Jayron went out with his stinger we had backups playing both corner spots, one of them a freshman. I suspected that eventually the next man up in this defense was going to be unable to perform at a high level, and we finally saw that in the ACCCG. The only adjustment Clemson had to make at halftime on offense was "throw to Bonner's man," and that's exactly what they did. Now please do not misunderstand me, Detrick Bonner is going to be a BEAST by the time he graduates, and being pressed into so much playing time in critical situations this season is just going to help him marinate as a player. But against Sammy Watkins and DeAndre Hopkins, Bonner was outmatched. So was Hill, for that matter. Had we been able to play Hosley and Fuller at the corners all night then perhaps things would have been different, but we couldn't and they weren't.
I just want to take a moment here and tell all of the people who were grumbling that Jayron didn't "look hurt" during the game to just shut the fuck up. Seriously. You have obviously never had a stinger, or you'd realize that they aren't visible injuries until you try to push yourself physically. Jayron would have played if he could.
But anyway, I knew going into this game there was a good shot Clemson was going to put up more points against our defense the second time around. But I expected our offense to be able to match them.
The opening fumble aside, LT did not have a complete clusterfuck of a game, regardless of what the scoreboard said. Despite press coverage on his receivers all night, which gives our offensive scheme fits and has for years, LT still managed to complete half his passes for 276 yards and an absolutely beautiful touchdown pass to DJ Coles. He threw two picks, both in the second half after Clemson had blown the game wide open and VT was in full-on pass mode. And he looked very indecisive at times, holding the ball for too long before committing to a run or throwing the ball away, and was probably trying to overcompensate for that later when he drew and unfortunate intentional grounding call. Was it a great game for LT? No. But he still played pretty well for as craptacular of a night as it was, and I guarantee you the young man can learn a lot from this game. The problem on offense was not LT.
The offensive line. Sweet fucking Jesus, this shit again? A big, physical defensive line shreds Newsome's line all damn night. Again. I see it. I assume all the Hokies watching from the stands or on TV see it. Why the fuck does Beamer not see it. Once again, Newsome and his zone blocking scheme has zero answers when it's trench warfare up front. I am so fucking tired of this guy still drawing a paycheck. Newsome's ineptitude prevented David Wilson from ever getting a decent hole to run through, which accomplished one of Clemson's primary objectives on defense: make us one dimensional. It's pretty well established now that the formula for shutting down VT is to eliminate the run and play man press coverage on the corners.
I have to give credit to Mike O'Cain for his play calling when it became apparent what Clemson's defensive gameplan was. Mike did his best to call plays that are designed to exploit aggressive defenses. We saw screen passes to Wilson, coupled with a very nice go route from the backfield that I wish we had seen more of this season. We saw some quick slants to DJ Coles and Marcus Davis. We saw some delayed QB draws. In general O'Cain was calling the things you want to be called in the situation we were in. The problem is, they were getting routinely blown up due to the O line's lack of answers for Clemson's pass rush. Balls were getting tipped all night, and when passes from your 6'6" QB with an over the top release are getting tipped, you know their defensive line is getting into the backfield way too damn quickly.
I mentioned in the comments on another post that I was very frustrated by how little O'Cain actually had to work with in the situation he found himself in against Clemson. Stiney and O'Cain need to use the bowl practices and a good chuck of the offseason developing a package of plays specifically for use against aggressive press coverage that don't rely on the run, because with our performance against Clemson this season you can bet we're about to see a lot of defenses do their best Tiger impression against us. Our offense is still predominantly geared toward intermediate and long passes. Now in general, with the way LT throws a longer ball, there's nothing wrong with that. But we also need an answer for what Clemson did to us defensively, and we need to figure out a way to nickle and dime our way down the field when a defense refuses to give us the time we need to let the longer plays develop.
In response to the officiating of this game, I'm just going to say it was bad and move on. I don't harp on officiating, and I don't like fans who do. There is no defense for how bad these officials were in the conference championship game, and I do sincerely hope John Swofford addresses some of the terrible calls and non-calls. During the game I certainly felt like we were having to play both Clemson and the refs, which was frustrating. But more frustrating than that was the fact that we let it get into our heads. We started playing some very sloppy football as our emotions got the best of us. I would have loved to have seen a well officiated game, but even moreso I would have loved to see our players maintain their composure when bad calls started to go against us. Football is a game of controlled aggression, and usually the team that can better control their aggression wins.
I will say this about the officials, though. Through refusing to call horse collar tackles and helmet to helmet hits they allowed for a very dangerous game to be played. Had someone been seriously injured, whether a Hokie or a Tiger, it would have been on their heads. For this reason - and not for any hypothetical contribution they made toward the Hokies' loss - this officiating crew should be addressed by the conference.
So by the end of the night you had a banged up defense with backups pressed into too many starting roles and players having to play out of position. You had an offense with no answers on the offensive line. You had a playbook lacking against press coverage. You had a team that lost composure over some questionable officiating.
You don't win those, folks.
FBS Mission Statement:
We at FBS believe that offensive coordinator Bryan Stinespring bears the largest share of the blame for years of sub-par output from some of the most talented players ever to set foot on Worsham Field. We believe the main objective of the VT football program - a national championship - will escape us as long as Stinespring is making the calls. We therefore advocate the improvement of our football program through the replacement of our offensive coordinator.
Wednesday, December 7, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
13 comments:
As always, great and accurate post (mostly). I have to disagree that LT had a "good" game. 1td-2ints (regardless of circumstances) plus a fum NOT good. I'll give you moderate but definitely NOT good.
I can give you O'Cain attempting to dial up plays that exposed Clem's D, but because they were ultimately unsuccessful and did NOT generate points (which is bottom line), mediocre and (as I've said before) made showed why NCSU & Clem were glad to be rid of him.
EVERYONE and their buried relatives are on the same page (well maybe not vthg88) about that Newsome.
I didn't know what to think about Hosely and the stinger. I felt a mixture of things: anger, wanted him to get back on & hope that he'll recover quickly. Bonner may be a redshirt froshie, but with the experience he's gotten this season I still expected him to do a little bit better. What star recruit was he?
You forgot to mention a couple other highlights:
1. Good game for Coles
2. Good game for Davis (who should've been utilized more for his size alone)
3. Good punting game for Danny "Ninja" Coale
4. Some decent returns by our future TB next year Gregory (many of which were negated by baseless penalties)
How do we fare next season against Clem at Death Valley since a number of their starterts will be returning? How negatively does this loss affect us in terms of recruiting AND the $64k dollar question: will CFB, O'CainSpring do ANYTHING to prepare for our match against the revamped wolvies or will it be ANOTHER important game loss tacked on to f-k*tard Beamers extensively pathetic record in this area?
DAMN I hate CFB right now because of his & Stineshit's undying & unwavering loyalty to shithead Newsome. A small part of me wishes and hopes that we get reamed by D. Robinson and Crew down in the Big Easy, just for the sake of further exposing the travesty of this three-headed beast from college football hell. I say this now, if (and at this point appears very likely) we get steamrolled come Jan, this won't be a reflection on the team, players, fans or program. Oh no. This will be a further reflection and expose` on Beamer & his idiot minions.
Love this quote by RK.
"When VT decided to have an empty case set aside for a National championship trophy, that raised the expectation level of every fan. To the point that losing to nearly every really good team we have played since that case was placed should be upsetting to all of us."
It's not OUR fault Beamer supported this but that it directly conflicts with his friendships. Just imagine if CFB poured an ounce of that loyalty & committment he has towards the monster Stinesome into honestly putting something in that empty-for-over-a-decade-now glass case. Just think.
"[O'CainSpring] need to use the bowl practices and a good chuck of the offseason developing a package of plays specifically for use against aggressive press coverage that don't rely on the run, because with our performance against Clemson this season you can bet we're about to see a lot of defenses do their best Tiger impression against us."
Yes they do. Unfortunately I believe Stiney and Newsome will spend the chunk of bowl practices and the offseason getting drunk and taking turns letting CFB spoon them. It's too bad that with all the integrity that's being spoken about Stiney and Newsome as people, they don't have the integrity to admit when they can't do something AND step down.
Great post as usual.
Agree completely about unnacceptably losing composure partly as a result of the poor officiating. Of all our strengths and weaknesses as compared to Clemson, I had expected mental toughness to be on our side.
Newsome's incompetence has truly cost us. It's simply painful to know that - facing a quality opponent with an athletic front (in primetime for all the nation to see, no less) we can expect to get manhandled in the trenches.
When you think about the 2nd half, the defense playing with two second string CBs, a CB at whip, a substitute at Mike (who admittedly has done well) and an undersized and 2nd-string defensive tackle, it's not hard to understand how things could spiral out of control.
As far as the Sugar Bowl goes, I'm not really worried about our defense matching up with the Michigan offense. Bud usually does very well with the whole month of December to scheme. I think our Collins and Gayle will be effective against their mediocre-sized offensive line. If we have Fuller and Hosley at CB our pass coverage should be better.
I'm assuming we get Tweedy back? This will be huge because it's the equivalent of getting the right players at two spots (CB and whip).
What I'm not sure about is how our offense matches up against their defense. I haven't really watched any Michigan football, but looking at a statistical profile, they seem to have a fundamentally sound defense. Not a ton of playmakers or jaw-dropping athletes, but smart and consistent. Statistically they are #18 in the nation. Rushing defense is slightly worse than their pass defense.
They get a decent amount of sacks, but not many tackles for loss. Few interceptions and passes defended. I think there D-line is probably pretty good, but not as fast and athletic as Clemson.
Interesting to see how O'Cain approaches this one.
A way too early take: seems like it'll shape up to a close, medium scoring 3-4 point game. Like 24-21 final, or something thereto. Likely will come down to turnovers.
Then again bowl games are very unpredictable. Could be a shootout. Could be a 13-10 defensive grinder.
"Unfortunately I believe Stiney and Newsome will spend the chunk of bowl practices and the offseason getting drunk and taking turns letting CFB spoon them."
Nice one, LAC. There's no way Frank Beamer could possibly argue with this point. He'll have to fire Newsome now.
Brilliant as always, dude. Keep 'em coming.
Nice summary.
LAC thanks for the shout out.
I will disagree a little on O'Cain. With the way they were tracking Wilson, a reverse or three should have been called. Imagine a reverse with LT blocking (recall film clip posted earlier this week).
As far as coaches go.
Does anyone else remember JC Price? D lineman who played 4 seasons in NFL and is now D line coach at JMU? I think he would make an outstanding line coach. Oh, and after my comment about our assistant coaches not getting better jobs elsewhere and that being indicative of not being great coaches. Richmond (where Mike London at UVa came from)just tried to hire Shane B as their HC. He said no and they hired the head coach from Liberty in Lynchburg. Interesting that he would say no to a HC gig at this point.
RK, I actually thought about a reverse during the game. Upon researching, though, I really don't think we would have had time to set it up with how damn quickly Clemson's D line was getting into our backfield. A reverse would have been a Stinespring answer to what Clemson was doing. O'Cain, to his credit, was doing his best to get the ball out of LT's hands quickly.
is the current offensive line capable of being better than they are if the coaching scheme was changed, or is part of it, just not being as big and strong as the competition.
IH - it is tough to run a reverse when the DT is 6 yards in the backfield. Anybody got a good reason why it seems we are not able to run a successful screen play? The seam route to Wilson out of the backfield was a thing of beauty. Good route, pass with touch. Great timing by the safety to lower the boom.
Bold prediction for the draft: Danny Coale goes to New England as a WR/KR/Punter enabling Belichick to have an extra player on the roster instead of a pure punter. He just seems like a Belichick type of guy.
Greeny, here's next season's projected starters across the OL, at least as far as I've heard.
Mark Shuman, OT, 6'7", 302 lbs, Rivals 4 star
Brent Benedict, OG, 6'5", 326 lbs, Rivals 4 star
Andrew Miller, C, 6'4", 290 lbs, Rivals 3 star
David Wang, OG, 6'1", 300 lbs, Rivals 3 star
Nick Becton, OT, 6'6", 326 lbs, Rivals 3 star
Despite being light at center and short at one OG spot, most bowl subdivision O lines don't come any bigger than this. But since we are a tad undersized on the inside of the line, look for teams next year to follow the same forumla of blitzing inside, and look for Newsome to have no answer for it, refusing to develop a "jumbo" package for the line.
Great write up but a waste of digital ink. This is the same shit since BS and Newsome combined forces. It will not change this month before um castrates us or next year, not until these two dumb asses are relieved of their duties.
What makes me sick is DW will be hauling ass probably because of this.
Also how many kids won't come due to the violence on campus. Prayers to VT again!
Musky, you gotta look at the positives. Sure, if we get our taints handed to us in NOLA it will hurt. Badly. Not gonna deny it. However, the flip side of the coin is that this continues to further expose the ineffective and inefficient coaching of Stine and Newsome and further puts cfb on unstable ground in terms of his defense and commitment to them (in a professional sense).
He did something this past offseason that he would have NEVER done in seasons past. He tweaked his coaching staff on the side of the ball that needs it most. Offense. Did it generate all the changes and results we want and needed to see? Hell no. But it has already started making a world of difference.
IF we were to lose big or lose period (as a hokie I pray and hope we don't) the positive would be that it continues to pressure Beamer to make necessary changes as he knows (and everyone else) that he can no longer hide or avoid it. This was evidenced in the offseason.
Post a Comment